{"id":12547,"date":"2024-02-15T18:43:17","date_gmt":"2024-02-15T17:43:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.arbetsgivarjuristen.se\/lessons\/3-16-arbetstagarens-egna-uppsagning\/"},"modified":"2025-03-12T21:29:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T20:29:10","slug":"3-16-the-employees-own-dismissal","status":"publish","type":"mpcs-lesson","link":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/courses\/kurs-i-arbetsratt\/lessons\/3-16-arbetstagarens-egna-uppsagning\/","title":{"rendered":"3.16 Employee&#039;s own termination"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>When the employee terminates his\/her employment of indefinite duration<\/h1>\n<p>An employee has the right to terminate his\/her permanent contract at any time. When you, as an employer, receive the notice of termination, you should acknowledge receipt in writing and keep this document. From the date of receipt of the notice, the notice period starts to run, which should follow the rules set out in the employment contract or collective agreement.<\/p>\n<h4>Can the employee change their mind and withdraw their dismissal?<\/h4>\n<p>The general rule is that an employee cannot withdraw a dismissal. However, there are situations, according to case law, where it is permissible to withdraw a dismissal. If the employee resigns in a fit of pique, for example because of an emotional impulse, and the employer is aware of this, it can be considered that the employer acted in bad faith. If the employee wishes to withdraw the dismissal shortly afterwards, this may be acceptable. However, the possibility to withdraw the dismissal decreases the more time passes after it was made.<\/p>\n<h4>When the employer provokes a dismissal<\/h4>\n<p>In some cases, the employee's own dismissal can be equated with a dismissal by the employer.<\/p>\n<p>When the employer, prior to the dismissal, has acted in a way that makes the employer realize that he has created a difficult situation for the employee and thus a risk that the employee will leave his employment for good.<\/p>\n<p>It is then usually said that the employer has violated good labor practices.<\/p>\n<h4>Practice<\/h4>\n<p>AD 2006 No 114<\/p>\n<p>The case concerns a forklift driver who did not show up for work one day. Two representatives of the company went to the employee's home where he resigned. Two days later, the employee requested to withdraw his dismissal. The judgment contains a good legal analysis of how AD views dismissals that the employee wants to withdraw.<\/p>\n<p>\"As a general rule, the termination of an employment contract is a legal act which, in principle, becomes immediately effective for the person who made it. Thus, an employee who has given notice is in principle bound by the notice. However, there are exceptions to this general rule in certain cases. In its case law, based on statements in the preparatory works of the Employment Protection Act, the Labour Court has held that, in certain circumstances, an employee's own dismissal can be equated with a dismissal by the employer and give rise, inter alia, to liability for damages on the part of the employer. However, in order for the employee's dismissal to be regarded as equivalent to dismissal by the employer, it is necessary for the employee's action to have been brought about by the employer and for the employer to have acted in a manner which is not in accordance with good practice in the employment market or which must otherwise be regarded as unfair. It has not been required that the employer directly aimed to induce the employee to leave his employment. For the employee's action to be equated with an action taken by the employer, it is considered sufficient that the employer realized that by his actions he had caused a difficult situation for the employee and thus a risk that the employee would leave his employment for good (see Bill C-4, Chapter 2, Section 2, of the Labour Code). <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/PROP_1973_0129_S_0128\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1973:129 p. 128 f.<\/a> and, more recently, the judges <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_2001_0055\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2001 No 55<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_2005_0024\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2005 No 24<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_2005_0063\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">63<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_2006_0079\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2006 No 79<\/a> with references made therein). In some cases, the Labor Court has also had to assess whether an employee's dismissal should be considered invalid or disregarded under the provisions of the Contract Act on the invalidity of legal acts. The provision in <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/SFS1915-0218_K0_P33\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">33 \u00a7<\/a>The Contracts Act applies when the circumstances at the time of the termination are such that the termination cannot be enforced against the employee. It is assumed that the employer must have been aware of the circumstances at the time of dismissal and that it would be contrary to good faith to enforce the dismissal with knowledge of the circumstances. If special circumstances so require, account may also be taken of what the employer knew or should have known after the dismissal but before the legal action had a determining effect on his conduct. Even an application of the provision in <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/SFS1915-0218_K0_P36\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36 \u00a7<\/a> Contract Act may be applicable. This may be relevant in cases where it would be unreasonable to enforce the termination, taking into account the circumstances at the time of the termination, subsequent events and the circumstances in general. The Labor Court has, inter alia, in the judgments <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_1991_0017\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1991 No 17<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_1993_0043\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1993 No 43<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_1996_0068\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1996 No 68<\/a> considered whether an employee's own notice of dismissal could be disregarded for the purposes of those provisions. In a number of cases, the Labour Court has also had to rule on the question of the effects of withdrawing a dismissal. The starting point, as already stated, is that dismissal is a legal act which is binding on the person who gave it. Nor can an employer be considered to be obliged to give any reasons for refusing to allow employees to withdraw their notice. However, special circumstances may sometimes mean that an employer's refusal to accept the rescission may be considered contrary to good labor practice and tantamount to a dismissal by the employer (see e.g. <a href=\"https:\/\/juno-nj-se.ludwig.lub.lu.se\/b\/documents\/abs\/AD_1983_0003\" data-testid=\"doc-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1983 No 3<\/a>). For example, the employee may have resigned in apparent haste after an angry exchange with the employer, but shortly afterwards - before the employer has had time to take any action in response to the resignation - withdrawn the resignation.\"<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","mpcs-curriculum-categories":[],"mpcs-curriculum-tags":[],"class_list":["post-12547","mpcs-lesson","type-mpcs-lesson","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mpcs-lesson\/12547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mpcs-lesson"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/mpcs-lesson"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"mpcs-curriculum-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mpcs-curriculum-categories?post=12547"},{"taxonomy":"mpcs-curriculum-tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lewlex.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mpcs-curriculum-tags?post=12547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}